<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conscious Cook &#187; marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.consciouscook.com/tag/marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.consciouscook.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Did We Start Eating Junk?</title>
		<link>http://blog.consciouscook.com/2009/08/why-did-we-start-eating-crap/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.consciouscook.com/2009/08/why-did-we-start-eating-crap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Slow Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slowfood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consciouscook.wordpress.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I like to think that the slow food/good food/real food movement (or whatever you want to call it) partly owes its success to the weird diet, the fallout-shelter &#8220;food&#8221; many of us grew up in the &#8217;70s and &#8217;80s. It all had one thing in common: left to its own devices, it would take months [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to think that the slow food/good food/real food movement (or whatever you want to call it) partly owes its success to the weird diet, the fallout-shelter &#8220;food&#8221; many of us grew up in the &#8217;70s and &#8217;80s. It all had one thing in common: left to its own devices, it would take months to decompose.</p>
<p>This diet, at least as I remember it in my household, consisted of canned everything, and instant everything. The first time I tasted frozen peas in early adulthood I remember thinking they didn&#8217;t taste very good. I had only ever known the pea in its dark, mushy, semi-fermented, straight-from-the-can incarnation. Other household standbys beside canned veggies included Shake&#8217;n'Bake chicken, Kraft Dinner, hot dogs on white Wonder Bread buns, and something we called rice and meat sauce.</p>
<div id="attachment_192" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 271px"><a href="http://contexts.org/socimages/2009/02/27/vintage-wonder-bread-boy-trap-ads/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-192 " title="Wonder Bread" src="http://consciouscook.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/wonderbreadadfrom1968.jpg?w=261" alt="&quot;Wonder Bread Helps Catch Boys!&quot; 1968" width="261" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;Wonder Bread Helps Catch Boys!&quot; 1968</p></div>
<p>Here&#8217;s the recipe for rice and meat sauce: Fry up some ground beef, mix in some spaghetti sauce from a can or jar, dump this on top of a bed of white Minute Rice, and serve. It was my brother&#8217;s favorite dish.</p>
<p>Why were we eating this way? Had the evil geniuses in food industry marketing departments talked us into it?</p>
<p>Monty Python did a spoof on marketing back in the &#8217;70s,  in which a salesman finds himself with a big box full of short bits of string, and must come up with clever ways to position them. &#8220;Simpson&#8217;s Individual Stringettes!&#8221; he cries. &#8220;A million household uses!&#8221; This soon gets upgraded to, &#8220;pre-sliced, rustproof, easy-to-handle, low-calorie Simpson&#8217;s Individual Emperor Stringettes, free from artificial coloring, as used in hospitals!&#8221;  Marketing is like that. Sometimes the producers are trying to foist something on you. On the other hand, sometimes they&#8217;re just eagerly attempting to stay abreast of a burgeoning, consumer-driven demand.</p>
<p>The food movement, as represented by Michael Pollan, often speaks of the food industry as an entity that has sold us on highly profitable processed goods. No doubt there&#8217;s plenty of truth in that. But I can clearly remember the pre-modern grocery store. I remember that it had plenty of raw materials on offer, as well as legions of grannies who still knew how to keep the butcher and the produce department manager honest. My family bought the cheap, canned, boxed, processed goods mainly because they required extremely little preparation. And why was that important? Well, for the obvious reason that both my parents had to work.</p>
<p>So we demanded those cheap, convenient processed foods. It was all we were eating. The more processed foods the food industry came up with, the greater the variety at the dinner table. And yes, our family also swallowed all that debunked nutritionist propaganda about fat being the great killer. We believed that so long as we were popping multivitamins and so long as we weren&#8217;t eating eggs fried in bacon grease for breakfast every morning, the processed food would take care of our nutritional needs just fine.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s certainly convenient to refer to the &#8220;food industry&#8221; as though there has been one guy in a suit running the whole show for the past forty years, pushing the highly processed food on an unsuspecting public. But when I reflect on food culture and what&#8217;s wrong with it, I can&#8217;t help thinking of my upbringing, and wondering if maybe the foodies have glossed over first causes.</p>
<p>Consider this: My parents generation was the first in memory that didn&#8217;t stand a chance of prospering without two incomes. Almost at the same historical moment that having a career became an option for all women, it became necessary for both parents to work in order to get by. And the food has been mostly crap ever since. If there are dark forces at work here, it has to do with more than just the food industry. Somewhere along the line families saw their workload doubled—without a corresponding increase in wealth and happiness. Perhaps that&#8217;s a better explanation for the modern diet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.consciouscook.com/2009/08/why-did-we-start-eating-crap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Problem with PR</title>
		<link>http://blog.consciouscook.com/2009/07/the-problem-with-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.consciouscook.com/2009/07/the-problem-with-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PR & Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consciouscook.wordpress.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>A few months ago, in the early days of Twitter, an interesting thing happened. Twitter was pregnant with inclusive, bipartisan promise way back then. The future looked bright, like M.J. circa 1988 or Britney before she married K-Fed. Here&#8217;s what happened: some of the PR folks at Monsanto responded to the many angry attacks on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-174 alignright" title="Influence for Cash" src="http://consciouscook.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/prlady.jpg" alt="Influence for Cash" width="457" height="265" /></p>
<p>A few months ago, in the early days of Twitter, an interesting thing happened. Twitter was pregnant with inclusive, bipartisan promise way back then. The future looked bright, like M.J. circa 1988 or Britney before she married K-Fed. Here&#8217;s what happened: some of the PR folks at Monsanto responded to the many angry attacks on that unpopular brand with one or two charmingly personal tweets. They wanted us to know that Monsanto is not staffed by child-eating hobgoblins; that they don&#8217;t sprinkle their cafeteria food with the salt of human tears; that they do, in fact, have lovely families, noble intentions and big hearts.</p>
<p>You know what, it&#8217;s easy to believe that&#8217;s true. I&#8217;ve not only met lots of &#8220;communications professionals,&#8221; I&#8217;ve been one. A few are total creeps, like this one slick dude I remember talking to several years ago who was trying to sell bottled oxygen. (A quick search revealed conclusive evidence that the product was worthless, except as a placebo, but did that deter him? No. He informed me that the manufacturers were in the process of commissioning their own scientific study which would tell the customers what he wanted them to hear.) But most are just doing a necessary, inevitable job, and some good souls have even dedicated themselves to the enlightened proposition that doing real good is the best PR play a company can make.</p>
<p>But the size of the hearts of public relations and marketing pros unfortunately, has little to do with the consequences of public relations and marketing. The problem with PR is that you get paid to do it. There&#8217;s an enormous bias built in.</p>
<p>Countless millions of dollars are paid to really impressive, intelligent, good people, so that they can tell us all about the positive side of organizations that have a strong financial interest in having us believe nice things about them. At the same time, these good people are being paid <em>not</em> to tell us the negative side, except as necessary damage control during a crisis. The bias is simple and obvious: huge companies like Monsanto can easily afford entire fleets of highly talented PR professionals. But you&#8217;re very unlikely to find one of these pros working for the non-profit and consumer advocacy groups that take up the other side of the question. There&#8217;s a windy silence over there, poorly filled by volunteers, amateurs, and the thin resources of what&#8217;s left of indy journalism.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s evil in public relations and marketing, it doesn&#8217;t proceed from the moral qualities of those in the profession. If proceeds from the fact that PR people and marketers have to eat, and pay for their mortgages. Look for them, and you will find them working diligently, honestly and with the best intentions for whatever company and whatever political party has the necessary cash. The net effect of the entire profession, no matter what individuals in it may aspire to, is not the unveiling of truth or the pursuit of the public good, but more power to money.</p>
<p>[This post was brought to you by someone who wasn't paid to write it, and therefore will probably never write something like this again. He has to eat.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.consciouscook.com/2009/07/the-problem-with-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
